Gabbard placed top adviser inside the ODNI’s watchdog office, officials say
Director
of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard installed one of her top
advisers within the office of the inspector general of the intelligence
community, compromising the watchdog office’s integrity, officials and
lawmakers say.
Director
of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard departs after her meeting with
the Philippine president at Malacanang Palace in Manila, on June 2.
(Ezra Acayan/Pool/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)
Director
of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard installed one of her top
advisers to a position within the office of the inspector general of the
intelligence community, according to two U.S. officials familiar with
the matter. The move potentially compromises the integrity of the
independent watchdog office while it is investigating the use of the
Signal messaging app by top government officials to discuss classified
details of a pending U.S. military strike against the Houthis in March.
The
adviser, Dennis Kirk, was placed within the watchdog office on May 9,
but reports to the DNI, according to one of the officials, who spoke on
the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity.
Rep.
Stephen F. Lynch (D-Massachusetts), the leading Democrat on the House
Oversight Committee, sent a letter to acting intelligence community
inspector general Tamara A. Johnson on Thursday, demanding information
about the appointment of Kirk, who was an adviser in the Office of
Personnel Management during President Donald Trump’s first term and
co-author of a Project 2025 chapter on the federal workforce.
Lynch
said the Oversight Committee was informed of the appointment by the
Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE), a
group made up of government watchdogs.
“The
appointment of a highly partisan advocate for prioritizing personal
loyalty to President Trump above independence and professionalism in the
federal government — and one who apparently answers to DNI Gabbard
rather than to you — in a senior role within [the intelligence community
inspector general’s office] raises troubling questions about the
independence of the IC IG and whether there exists a need for Congress
to strengthen protections for the IC IG’s independence,” Lynch wrote to
Johnson.
Gabbard’s office in turn accused the intelligence community inspector general of politicization.
In
a statement to The Washington Post, Gabbard’s press secretary, Olivia
Coleman, accused the intelligence community inspector general of failing
to fulfill “the responsibility to be an independent organization
unbeholden to partisan interests.”
Coleman
said that Kirk was assigned to the watchdog office as part of the
transition team and found “evidence of overwhelming and intentional
politicization by the current IC IG team.”
The
office’s leadership, she said, has “bucked President Trump’s
directives” regarding diversity, equity and inclusion, “slow-walked
responses to Congressional Republicans while prioritizing responding to
Democrats, abused taxpayer dollars for personal purposes, and created a
workplace environment filled with politically motivated action,” she
said. “This is unacceptable on all fronts, and the DNI is taking action
to ensure the IG office is focused on fulfilling its mission.”
Johnson did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
The
latest apparent political installation in the intelligence community
inspector general’s office comes amid broader concerns about the
independence of government watchdogs. Trump purged most inspectors general at Cabinet-level agencies in January, and in recent weeks has nominated six new inspectors general, including three with clearly partisan backgrounds.
“Having
a senior official placed in any inspector general’s office who reports
to the agency head, in this case DNI, would undermine the entire
construct of independence that is integral to the IG’s oversight
mission,” said Mark Greenblatt, a former Trump-appointed Interior
Department inspector general and former chairman of CIGIE.
Lynch, who is the acting leading Democrat on the committee after Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Virginia) died last month,
raised urgent concern about the independence of the office’s ongoing
investigation into the Signal chat between Trump’s top national security
officials planning an air attack on Yemen, and which accidentally
included a prominent journalist. Connolly had requested that Johnson launch an investigation into the use of the commercial messaging app in military operations in April.
“The
purported appointment of the IC IG ‘senior adviser’ heightens existing
concerns about politicization and improper conduct at ODNI, including
the subordination of competence and accountability at the agency to
political fealty to President Trump,” Lynch wrote.
Lynch
referred to Gabbard recently removing veteran senior intelligence
analysts for apparently political reasons. Last month, Gabbard fired the two top officials at the National Intelligence Council
after the release of a declassified memo contradicted Trump’s national
security justification for deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members
without due process. It later emerged that a top Gabbard aide, Joe Kent,
had asked for the intelligence analysis to be rewritten because it
undercut the White House assertion that the Venezuelan government was
directing the gang, Tren de Aragua.
The
intelligence community inspector general was set up by statute in 2010
to provide independent oversight over the now 18 agencies in the
intelligence community.
The
position rose to prominence during Trump’s first term when, in
September 2019, intelligence community Inspector General Michael
Atkinson alerted Congress to a whistleblower complaint about Trump. The
complaint, lodged by an intelligence community official, arose from a
call in which Trump pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to
investigate his presumptive rival for the 2020 presidency, Joe Biden,
and his son Hunter Biden.
News of the whistleblower complaint leaked,
and ultimately led the White House to publicly release the complaint
and the transcript of what Trump described as a “perfect” call.
The
resulting firestorm over the phone call led to Trump’s first
impeachment in December 2019. Trump was acquitted by the Senate in
January 2020.
In April 2020, Trump notified Congress that he had dismissed Atkinson, saying he had done a “terrible job.”
Alice Crites contributed to this report.